The int cluster did not enforce Pod Security when this was written - no namespace labels, no Kyverno or Gatekeeper. The sandbox was NOT checked; there is no kubeconfig context for it. A cluster that does enforce it rejects the pod outright rather than degrading, which is slow to diagnose from an unrelated namespace.
Records the matching gap it cannot fix: PipesK8sClient builds the payload pod specs, and this service passes no securityContext through base_pod_spec, so a restricted namespace would admit the dispatcher and reject every payload it creates.
Changelog: changed
Runs loosely_coupled_k8s_job from one throwaway pod with only the RBAC the pipes client needs, clearing readiness checks L4-L9 without deploying a code location, a webserver or a database. Because the pod is its own control plane it also sidesteps the 1.13.19 vs 1.12.8 skew that blocks registering this service against the sandbox Dagster.
Verified in the container beforehand: the CLI form reaches RUN_SUCCESS, the multiprocess executor fans out to four dynamic steps, and PipesK8sClient selects in-cluster credentials from KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST, so no code change is needed to run it in a pod.
Changelog: added
dagster 1.12.8 has no per-deployment imagePullSecrets field: deployment-user.yaml reads the dagster-user-deployments subchart value and the run launcher helper reads the parent chart value. The pull secret nested under the deployments[] entry was silently discarded, which would have produced ImagePullBackOff against a values file that reads as correct.
Also records the unresolved 1.13.19 vs 1.12.8 skew between these images and the sandbox control plane.
Changelog: fixed
This repository is built by the shared ds.gitlab-ci.yml template; carrying a second CI system alongside it invited the reader to wonder which one is authoritative. The Gitea Actions workflow that builds both images stays in the sandbox Gitea mirror, which is where the sandbox images are produced.
The README, the pipes payload values and the sandbox values no longer point at a file this repository does not contain.
Changelog: removed
The GitLab project lives at simpl-open/data/supporting-data-services/distributed-execution/distributed-execution, so CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE ends in the project name twice. The pipeline pushes to CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE and nowhere else, so the earlier one-segment path named an image nobody builds - the same mismatch that field-level-pseudo-anonymisation and dataframe-level-anonymisation carry today.
Changelog: fixed
yaml/sandbox/values-sandbox-gitea.yaml carries the registry coordinates, the pull secret both namespaces need, and the commit SHA the two images share. The sandbox registry rejects anonymous pulls, so a payload namespace without its own pull secret leaves the dispatching op waiting on a pod that never starts - readiness check L4 now says so.
Changelog: added
Canonical location for documentation, example workflows and reference service implementations covering distributed execution patterns. Covers AC1-AC4: execution-target selection, decision support, readiness checks and code-level linkage. Tightly coupled jobs and the loosely coupled subprocess transport are verified by the test suite; the Kubernetes pipes transport is implemented but not yet cluster-run and is marked as such in the guide.
Changelog: added